Peer review of student outcomes with colleagues in another university

The following peer feedback form was used in the inter-university peer review project to monitor and assure final-year module/subject and programme achievement standards. Consider how you might use this to expand your repertoire of evidence regarding student learning in your module or programme.

PEER FEEDBACK FORM

SECTION A: YOUR FEEDBACK ON THE module/subject outline

In reviewing the module/subject outline:

1    To what extent does the module/subject outline cover all that, in your view, a final-year undergraduate module on this topic should cover? (Please circle the number that best represents your view)

Not at all	Somewhat	Adequately	Very well	Completely
1	2	3	4	5

Please list up to three reasons for making this rating

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

2a    To what extent does the module/subject outline guide explain how the assessment tasks relate to the unit learning outcomes? (Please circle)

Not at all	Somewhat	Adequately	Very well	Completely
1	2	3	4	5

2b  To what extent does the module/subject outline explain how the assessment tasks relate to the overall graduate outcomes of the degree programme? (Please circle)

Not at all	Somewhat	Adequately	Very well	Completely
1	2	3	4	5

To what extent does the module/subject outline explain clearly (preferably with examples) the requirements for achieving at various grade levels (e.g., what is required to achieve a credit, distinction etc.)? (Please circle)

Not at all	Somewhat	Adequately	Very well	Completely
1	2	3	4	5

Comments

3    Please list up to three reasons for making this rating

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

4    What, briefly, are the best aspects of the module/subject outline?

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

5    Do you have any suggestions for further enhancing the module/subject outline?

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

SECTION B: YOUR FEEDBACK ON THE GRADING GUIDELINES

In reviewing the assessment grading guidelines provided for the sample assessment task/s that you are reviewing:

1    To what extent is it clear how student work will be awarded grades at different levels for that assessment task?

Not at all	Somewhat	Adequately	Very well	Completely
1	2	3	4	5

Please elaborate on your response

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

2    To what extent are the grading criteria at an appropriate level for final-year undergraduate module/subject in this field of education?

Not at all	Somewhat	Adequately	Very well	Completely
1	2	3	4	5

Please elaborate on your response

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

SECTION C: YOUR FEEDBACK ON ASSESSMENT TASK/S

In reviewing the list of assessment tasks which students have to complete in the module/subject outline:

1    To what extent is the range of assessment tasks suited to assessing the key learning objectives listed in the module/subject outline?

Not at all	Somewhat	Adequately	Very well	Completely
1	2	3	4	5

Please elaborate on your response

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________